Squeamish Bikini
  • Home
  • Squeamish Features
  • Squeamish Reviews
  • Squeamish News
  • Squeamish Contact
  • About Squeamish

The New Cis-Term Cistem 

25/3/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
Look up cis. Image: Joel Kramer
Words are important. That goes (ironically) without saying, surely? The labels that we put on things and the ways in which we discuss them affect our views of them. Discussions of language are not uncommon in feminism - part of wanting to change things is thinking about how current power structures are created by and propped up by the ways we talk about them.

When I was at primary school, we talked about firemen, policemen, postmen. Now the general terms for these jobs are firefighter, police officer, postie. At work our meetings have a chair, not a chairman. Yes, these are small things, but they remove a linguistic signal that says these jobs are only for men to do, or that male is the default, female an afterthought, an add-on. A lot of language is male-dominated, because for so long men were seen as the default. Changing that helps us to realise it's no longer the case. Or rather, it shouldn't be.

In a similar way, talking about straight people means the possibility of people not being straight is acknowledged. I was at an event recently advertised as being for 'couples and single women'. It was only when I got there that I realised the organisers meant straight (male/female) couples. I spend so much of my life in spaces that are to greater or lesser extents queer that it hadn't occurred to me. But to the organisers, the idea of having to specify that they meant straight couples never crossed their minds - heterosexual is the default, so why would they mean anything else?
And so we come on to 'cis', a word lots of people seem to be talking about at the moment. Cis is a Latin preposition meaning 'on this side', as opposed to the Latin preposition trans which means 'on the other side.' Kristen Schilt and Laurel Westbrook define cisgender as a label for "individuals who have a match between the gender they were assigned at birth, their bodies, and their personal identity"

So if that applies to you, you might be thinking: 'neat! now I have a new word to sum up my gender identity.'

'neat! Now I have a new word to sum up my gender identity.'

Or, like Sadie Smith writing for the New Statesman, you might not: "A lot of cis women have a problem with the term in a way they can’t quite fathom. Well, I’ve fathomed it and I’ll tell you: because it’s a name that has, once again, been conferred upon a certain group of women without their consent. It would still matter, although infinitely not as much, if a Twitter search of “cis” demonstrated that the term is mostly used in a sisterly and affectionate manner. Nah, more like “cissexist” or “cisfascist”.

And that’s the stuff I didn’t search for, I just happened to see it on my feed one Tuesday evening.

So forgive me if I hear “cis” as an insult to the very essence of who I am and then, when I complain, feel aggrieved that I’m not entitled to experience my discomfort because my “privilege” means that my point of view doesn’t matter and my opinions don’t count."

I can't agree.

By adopting the word cis we ensure that we have words to describe different experiences. Without it, cis is positioned as the default, the norm. By only ever 'naming' trans we're essentially pointing a big flashing arrow at trans people that says 'different! strange!' Talking about cis experiences, identifying as cis, means acknowledging that there is room for more than just what is seen as the default.

I think this makes some people uncomfortable because they're not used to looking at themselves in this way. It reminds me of the way other groups react when they're called out - if you've never seen a straight white man get annoyed because someone has pointed out that his experience is not necessarily universal, it's unlikely you've spent much time online.

Let's listen to each other. Let's find new ways to do that. Let's stop assuming that certain groups have a monopoly on what is 'normal.'

Squeamish Louise
submit to reddit
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011

    Categories

    All
    Books
    Booze
    Cinematic
    Dress Up
    Educating Sue
    Educating Sue
    Friday 5
    Friday 5
    Geekery
    Gender Agender
    Gender Agender
    Glitter And Twisted
    Glitter And Twisted
    History Repeating
    History Repeating
    How To
    Just A Thought
    Just A Thought
    Let's Get Political
    Let's Get Political
    Music
    Nom Nom Nom
    Nostalgia
    Tellybox
    Why You Should Love

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photos from Pink Sherbet Photography, anunez619, NikRugby23!, Asso Pixiel