Squeamish Bikini
  • Home
  • Squeamish Features
  • Squeamish Reviews
  • Squeamish News
  • Squeamish Contact
  • About Squeamish

The Grip of A Sisterly Vice

18/2/2014

0 Comments

 
PictureIs Skipper holding Barbie back, not Ken?
According to Cosmopolitan magazine's agony aunt Irma Kurtz women are continuing to set themselves up as rivals rather than sisters. Speaking to Stella magazine Kurtz said: "Now there is less about sex, less 'she's trying to flirt with my bloke' and more anxiety about competition on the office floor. 'who does she think she is' - that sort of thing...I call envy 'the sisterly vice' and it's one we are more open to than ever now we have more areas in which to compete." Is it really a change in the nature of the competitions we can take part in, or a lack of change in the way we compete that's preventing women from forming sisterhood?

I wrote only yesterday about how, while portraying a wonderful sisterly female friendship on Parks and Recreation with Amy Poehler, Rashida Jones lapsed into this 'sisterly vice' with Hadley Freeman in an interview. The trouble with the sisterly vice is it is often the only visible way in which women are shown to bond.

In fiction female friendships can be founded on a mutual dislike of another woman's personality or outfit, sometimes on an ability to fit into the same pair of jeans (not at the same time) but rarely on a common interest outside of bitching.

It's the constant portrayal of women only interacting in bitchery - which can take many forms, idle gossip, a burn book (or blog now - gosh Mean Girls has aged) or a certain high mindedness that soon descends into concern trolling - that results in some women choosing to opt out, loudly informing people that girls bore her. I do it, so did Amanda Craig, writing in the Telegraph that: "Despite being a cradle feminist, I am ashamed to remember feeling bored by the majority of my own sex for most of my twenties, because men were what interested me. It wasn't just the quest for love and a husband; I was convinced that the way women seemed to think, with the emphasis on emotional sensitivity rather than robust debate, was tiresome - a prejudice largely derived from the inferior education my sex received, which time and experience disproved."
As our brothers seize the opportunity to become fat cats with the cream, as we sister pigeons scratch over the crumbs and we seem to only be able to recognise it by differentiating ourselves. Cosying up to the menfolk all buddy-buddy by saying "Oh gosh, don't worry, I'm not like that" instead of "look what we are reduced to by mere lack of imagination!"

When women knew their lot and it was rubbish. Easier isn't better.

Irma Kurtz has her own theories on what feeds the 'sisterly vice': "It was easier in a way when there was less choice." I would argue it was easier when there was less of a lie. When women knew their lot and it was rubbish. Easier isn't better. It's just more convenient for a section of people. It's easier but not better for husbands if marital rape isn't recognised. It's easier but not better for doctors if they are allowed to just wrench babies from the mother vessel with forceps. It's easier but not better for everybody if rape survivors just shh 'cos I don't want to hear about it. Y'all were probably drinking anyway. 

As Craig notes in her article it wasn't long ago that her own generation of women fought for university places and jobs in a way that my generation do not have to. However it is vital we understand we are in the transitional phase. We're still being held back. As Mary Beard said on Friday at a London Review of Books lecture at the British Museum women who speak out and demand their worth is based on the content of what they say: "get treated as freakish androgynes"

"Across the board we still seem resistant of female encroachment into traditional male territory, whether that is the abuse hurled at Jacqui Oatley for having the nerve to stray from the netball court for becoming the first woman commentator on Match of the Day, or what can get meted out to women who appear on Question Time."

"We just have got to have a bit more consciousness-raising, old-fashioned feminist consciousness-raising. How do we use language? Why does it matter? And how does it put women down?...And unless you recognise that it is culturally hardwired into us, then we are never going to get it right."

Maybe there is such a thing as a sisterly vice. Can we talk our way out of its grip? With a sister like Mary Beard, I hope so.

Squeamish Kate
submit to reddit
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011

    Categories

    All
    Books
    Booze
    Cinematic
    Dress Up
    Educating Sue
    Educating Sue
    Friday 5
    Friday 5
    Geekery
    Gender Agender
    Gender Agender
    Glitter And Twisted
    Glitter And Twisted
    History Repeating
    History Repeating
    How To
    Just A Thought
    Just A Thought
    Let's Get Political
    Let's Get Political
    Music
    Nom Nom Nom
    Nostalgia
    Tellybox
    Why You Should Love

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photos from Pink Sherbet Photography, anunez619, NikRugby23!, Asso Pixiel